Phentermine.
Two grilled cutlets in the oven, seasoned with cayenne pepper, salt, lemon, and a little vanilla. Nice.
The Tribune just about sums it up for me with regards to Obama and Clinton
"We're urging votes for a candidate whose political views we often disagree with. But this is a more complicated contest, and a more complex candidate, than the norm. This nation's next president inherits a war -- against terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere -- that has found many ways to divide Americans. Capitol Hill is gridlocked and uncivil. Our discourse is hostage to blame.For the Democrats: Obama -- chicagotribune.comObama can help this nation move forward. A Tribune profile last May labeled his eight years in Springfield as "a study in complexity, caution and calculation. In the minority party for all but his final two years in the Statehouse, he tempered a progressive agenda with a cold dash of realism, often forging consensus with conservative Republicans when other liberals wanted to crusade."Racial profiling, death penalty reform, recording of criminal interrogations, health care -- when victory was elusive, Obama seized progress.
He did so by working fluidly with Republicans and Democrats. He sought out his ideological foes. He listened closely to them. As a result, many Republicans in Illinois have warm words for Barack Obama.
Obama's key opponent, U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, unifies only her foes. Her penchant for gaming every issue -- recall her clumsy dodging when asked in a Philadelphia debate whether illegal immigrants should be licensed to drive -- feeds suspicion of maneuvering that would humble Machiavelli.As this campaign has progressed, Hillary Clinton in moments of crisis hasn't been an ennobling sight. Her reliance on her husband, the less-than-presidential Bill, to trash-talk Obama reaffirms that the Clintons do whatever it takes to prevail. Depicting Obama's record on Iraq as a "fairy tale" is instructive: Think what you will of the war, but Sen. Clinton was an enabler when that was popular. In Kerryspeak, she was for the war before she was against the war."
Blogged with Flock
I can haz friendz? Facebook powering the rest of the web (and maybe a new business model)
I hope the news that Facebook has just opened up its API to applications that sit outside of it is true. Frankly, as cool as the concept of Facebook apps are, needing to build inside their little box is very constricting. At Path 101, we were definitely going to leverage the Facebook platform around our personality testing, because we thought that comparing results to friends could be very viral, but, to be honest, needing to build that app to live within Facebook wasn't so exciting.
Now, we can just take the existing application and have the social aspect "powered by Facebook". That's very compelling.
It seems that Facebook understands that users don't spend 100% of their time on Facebook, so there's no sense trying to keep them there. By extending out to the rest of the web, they're making membership in Facebook that much more valuable. Even people who might not want to spend a lot of time on the site could see value in keeping their social network there, kind of like an address book.
I wonder if there's a business model in here. What if this made Facebook the defacto social dialtone on the web? Could they charge for API access, kind of like Amazon is doing with S3? What if it cost websites a few pennies everytime a user spread their app to their friends via the Facebook API anywhere on the web. Certainly most sites pay for user acquisition on some way. If they could set the right throttles and controls, I could see Facebook taking a small sliver of every single social transaction on the web--that's IF they get the social thing right.
In its current form, the viral spread of Facebook apps is, while trendsetting, still kind of hokey and it clutters up the user's experience. I like the fact that they're continuing to experiment, and this move could give them a whole new playing ground. When if you went to an app on the web, and it automatically told you that 25 of your friends have already used it and you could compare data with one click? That would be pretty neat, I think.
Thoughts?
Blogged with Flock
links for 2008-01-24
-
A practical blog for impractical people.
-
Confusion disappears when everyone starts using the same screens.
Amen, Brother... Investing through the economic downturn.
If I take the last downturn as my guide, I can say with confidence that venture investors would be well suited to continue to invest right through the downturn - in 2002 and 2003 terrific companies were formed and funded at very reasonable valuations and with business models that reflected the demand for capital efficiency and economic viability.Will Price: Downturn - Now What?
From Will's blog to VC's ears...
Blogged with Flock
links for 2008-01-22
-
Terraminds micro search engine allows searches in tweets and users back to three months ago.
The Fake Reach
You know what the Fake Reach is... You've either done it or expected someone to do it.
You're out at lunch with Bill Gates. He invited you to join him to get your expertise on social media. The bill comes.
You do the Fake Reach.
You have absolutely no intention to contribute any money to this meal and all social ettiquette rules dictate that he should treat. Still, you don't want to seem too entitled or expectant, so you fake willingness to pay just to acknowledge their gesture of paying.
You wait for them to waive you off...
"No, no... I got it."
"You sure?"
"Yeah, my pleasure..."
"Oh, thanks...I got it next time."
Ever been on the other side of a date where you knew you were paying or being paid for and the Fake Reach was used?
Giselle sneaks away from Tom Brady to go to lunch with you and the bill comes for your meals. Does Giselle even carry money? What would be the point? Does she need to pay anywhere for anything?
Still, she's gotta do the Fake Reach. Lord knows, given some of the outfits she wears, where she'd even reach, but still, she's gotta reach. Otherwise, in my book, she's definitely not worth the second date. :)
Dodge This!
I got some good coverage on the Sportsvite blog, WreckSports... apparently word is getting out about my phenom status in dodgeball.
Therefore, I'd like to announce that I am in training for the Beijing '08 Summer Olympics. Yes, dodgeball is finally an Olympic sport and I've been selected to captain the team.
Don't believe me?
Check out these videos:
Block, block, block, throw! from ceonyc on Vimeo.
Block and fast catch from ceonyc on Vimeo.
Throw, Dodge, Throw from ceonyc on Vimeo.
Blogged with Flock
links for 2008-01-21
-
Presentation from web directions 2007
-
Google Tech TalksMay 14, 2007ABSTRACTMuch of what we know about innovation is wrong. That's the bet this talk takes, as it romps through the history of innov...
Relationship Perspective
My friend just had a baby... a completely unexpected baby as of about three months before she was born. The details of how a baby can be unexpected so far along are unimportant. The most important thing is that I witnessed a couple so singularly focused on this new little person that it really affected me. This couple isn't married and they haven't been dating much more than a year or so, but now they're a family.
They're a family because they all chose to be so. Well, the baby didn't choose, but knowing the parents, I'm pretty confident she would have made the same chose.
Does this couple know every last little detail about each other? Nope.
Do they know all of their roommate idiosyncrasies, like whether there's drinking from the carton or balls of hair left in the shower? Doubtful.
But this little person just seem to make all that insignificant Maybe you're a match on paper, maybe you're not. Bottom line is that you've got two people dedicated to figuring it out for the sake of another.
When I think of it that way, it doesn't seem like such a stretch to think that two people should be able to figure things out if they just do it for the sake of each other. Love shouldn't be so hard and there's certainly too much stuff we let get in the way of it.
It seems like most of us clutter up our minds and our hearts with truly insignificant crap. We're not good at reduction. We can always think of more things to worry about, to ponder, to get excited about, but how often do we focus on less things?
This couple now has one thing to think about, and all of the sudden, their life, rather than being complicated by this beautiful baby, now seems so simple.
They don't need a 72-point eHarmony diagnostic to tell them if they're a match. They don't need to treat the other person like a discounted cash flow model--calculating whether or not they'll be able to support them in the lifestyle and social status that they're accustomed to. They don't need congressional approval from the congress of friends in their life--mostly temporary people who have a nearly non-existent stake in the outcome of their lives and who probably won't be around for half of it.
We live in an age where information, in addition to informing us, pollutes us. We're paralyzed by fear. Rather than look at our own job security, we watch the unemployment number. Rather than look at our own budget, we watch the housing foreclosure numbers. We're so focused on staying at home to watch the consumer confidence index, rather than going out and buying the things we can afford that we really want. And if we can't afford them, we spend too much time watching what other people have to appreciate the things we do have.
Its funny, too, when you think about what people choose to optimize for. A lot of people decide that they'd rather be focused on careers rather than family. Given the empirical evidence, I'd say that you have a lot better shot at reaching happiness through living for others than living for your job. (Of course, I of all people still think its extremely worth it to also focus on reaching happiness in your job, but there's got to be some kind of priorities.)
So what's truly important to you in your life? How long is that list?
I'd say that if your list is any more than about two or three things, its too damn long. Focus, people!
Blogged with Flock
Feed Cleanup... Need some inspiration
Over the last week or so, I've unsubscribed from a number of feeds that just weren't doing it for me. Interestingly enough, what I've been left with is a feedreader full of my friends. More than half the blogs I subscribe to are friends of mine.
I could use some suggestions on new blogs to be reading. Here's some key criteria:
- People who are thoughtful about career and life decisions.
- Anyone who takes Web 2.0 with a nice heaping grain of salt and doesn't get too caught up in the hype.
- People with outside interests.
- New Yorkers especially welcome.
- People with a good sense of humor.
Blogged with Flock
Why are women always cold?
@ptrain just threw on a hat and scarf...meanwhile I'm sitting here in bed in my Twitter t-shirt and boxers. I think she's leaking antifreeze... I'm going to go check the last place she was sitting for neon green liquid.
My friend Sandy, who brought kayaking to Hoboken, lost her apartment in a fire.... Please help
Over the last few years, Sandy Sobanski has led a group of Downtown Boathouse volunteers over to Hoboken's Frank Sinatra Park to bring free kayaking across the river. Over time, the Hoboken kayaking program has become a summer fixture. This year, the program will become even more permanent as it moves to the Maxwellhouse Boathouse and becomes it's own independent program.
If you've ever worked with any kind of local government, you know that getting new programs run on public property isn't easy. Sandy's been at this for a few years now and 2008 was all set to be a big year for her and the new program.
That was, until a Hoboken fire destroyed her and her husband's apartment on January 7th. Since then, they've been staying in temporary housing--a chain hotel... and hopefully they'll be able to move into something more permanent soon.
Her insurance isn't going to cover all of her costs, and it's going to be some time before she's able to get her affairs in order to be able to get back work. Sandy works tirelessly, without asking for anything in return, to better the Hudson River waterfront and make sure its resources are made available to the public.
To have this happen to her of all people isn't fair... not that anyone deserves to lose everything like this... but to have someone who has given so much back to her local community have her own local environment go up in flames... it's really quite tragic.
That's why I'm helping the Downtown Boathouse raise money to help her get back on her feet. With nearly 2400 mostly local subscribers, I'm hoping there are enough people who have either participated in some of the Hudson River kayaking, or who just care about the waterfront, that are willing to help out someone who has done a lot of great work for it. I'll be matching donations from my readers up to $500 to help Sandy out.
Here's how you can help... even a five spot will go a long way... there's power in numbers. You can make out a check to: The Downtown Boathouse Inc. West Village Station Box 20214 New York, NY 10014-9998 Memo: Sandy Fire Relief (from Charlie's blog)
Blogged with Flock
Unfortunately, I have to unsubscribe to the Dilbert Blog
A while back, Scott Adams wrote how blogging wasn't really boosting his bottom line the way he thought it would, so he decided to make some changes. He has decided not only to blog less, but also to go to partial RSS feeds.
His reasoning is that, unless you were coming to the site, he couldn't monetize you as well. It wasn't clear that he had ever heard of Feedburner ads for RSS.
So, he made the calculation that he could force those reading his RSS feed to come to the site to read full feeds. In my case, he can't, because I read a lot of my RSS feeds offline, when I'm on the subway reading through my phone, though Newsgator Mobile. When I like a post, I clip it, and often send it to others or tag it in del.icio.us for later, meaning the link winds up on my blog and I send some traffic his way.
Either way, as an RSS reader, I'm still net positive on total pageviews. Moving me to partial feeds doesn't make me add pageviews, it makes me completely disappear. This is the case for a lot of RSS readers... going to partial feeds will make your RSS audience dry up, engage less, and certainly never pass the site to others.
I kept the feed in my reader hoping it would change back, but he seems pretty set in his ways, so I'm unsubscribing. I read RSS feeds and if you're not going to publish a full feed, then I'm not going to read you. It's a shame, b/c the Dilbert Blog was one of my favorites.
Blogged with Flock
Do first impressions matter anymore?
As always, any trend that I notice occuring because of technology's effect on people should be taken with a grain of salt... you know, because of that vaccuous Web 2.0 echo chamber that I sleep in.
That being said, I'm realizing that a lot of the relationships I've built up with people lately have been built up over time, nutured slowly by tiny bits of information and without the pressure of thinking that if you don't do a complete data download on the first meeting, you'll lose the chance to reconnect. For example, I started reading Rob May's BusinessPundit blog (He's now over at CoconutHeadsets.com...sorry no link, posting by mobile) about two years before I ever met him in person. His blog just had to be readable enough for me to think I might want to go back to it again for it to get a tryout in my RSS reader...not a very high bar. But, it stuck, and we both wound up at last year's SXSW conference. Not only did it not seem weird, but all the previous back history of communication between us made the first inperson meeting that much easier. I didn't have all sorts of unfulfilled expectations or bad assumptions... I learned enough over time that I had a much more realistic view of him. Plus, I knew that, even if we didn't become best buds right then and there, our digital connection would keep conversation going, probably enable other chances to meet...It really took any pressure to form an immediate strong link off the table.
The same thing seems to be happening in poltics. I'll bet that when you had one chance to meet a candidate--the one time their election train rolled through your town, your first impression of them became a lot more meaningful. In today's world, we've swung to the opposite. Everyday, you see a new video clip. One day you think Hillary's a bitch, the next day you think she's warm and sensitive because she cries at a cafe hundreds of miles away. And what about John McCain? Didn't we have him left for dead not too long ago... wasn't Rudy the leading Republican candidate at one time? Turned out Rudy was a one trick pony and McCain can haz nine livez.
The ability to hang around the rim...to lurk, engage lightly, linger, subscribe, connect means that we have increased the window of opportunity we have to get to know each other...almost indefinately. I think that's great, because prejudgements are often wrong. How many of your favorite people did you initially have a not so great first impression of? Plus, how much could you really get to know someone on a first pass? People are so deep and complex, more information and a longer window to make judgements can only be a good thing. I mean, imagine if you could only hire employees based on resumes--no interviews, no trial periods...just a small bit of superficial information that corralates little to the lifetime value of what this person can bring to the table.
That's why I'm excited about Path 101' ability to help people get to know themselves better in relation to career discovery, because it will also allow potential employers to get to know them better as well.