ESPN Page 2 - Behind the Hall of Fame ballot
Don Mattingly: The people who want you to vote for him say he was great before he hurt his back. Well let me tell you something: My cousin used to be a math whiz until he fell out of a pickup truck when he was 12 and hit his head on the curb. He couldn't count his fingers after that. Did they let him into MIT anyway? No, they did not. End of parable.ESPN Page 2 - Behind the Hall of Fame ballot
Blogged with Flock
Toss another victim on the Web 2.0 Whack-a-mole heap: Jaiku adrift inside Google
Don't mind me... I just wanted to say "I told you so..."
Remind us not to sell Path 101 too early, before it's achieved enough scale to weather big company neglect.
Blogged with Flock
Don't call it a comeback
As of this moment, they're predicting Hillary winning New Hampshire by 3% over Obama.
I don't call that a comeback.
John Edwards took 17% of the vote. If Edwards doesn't win, who do you think most of those people are going to back? Certainly not Hillary after his unrelenting attack on her special interest ties.
Not to mention the fact that, to get the nomination, you need to win delegates, not votes. Clinton and Obama tied at 9 pledged delegates a piece. There are 5 superdelegates from NH and who the heck knows how that works, but either way, it's not totally clear that Obama will not sill win the vote of the delegates from NH come convention time.
I think Edwards should just quit now, campaign for Obama, beat Hillary, and be VP and run again after. He's certainly young enough. Both him and Obama are both about change and they're going to need to combine forces to win.
Blogged with Flock
links for 2008-01-07
-
Ranking the top blogs and bloggers in advertising, marketing and media.
Dear Peter Kalikow, MTA: Wait for me, dammit!
This morning, my local R train arrived at 59th Street in Brooklyn just as an N train sat waiting on the express side. As the R train slowed to open its doors, the N train started up and took off, much to the shagrin of all of the R train passengers who wanted to transfer to the express. The N was not full and this is the second time this has happened to me in a week. I've been riding the subway almost everyday since I was 14 and if I had a dollar for everytime this happened to me, across multiple lines, I wouldn't be concerned about another fare hike.
Customers on the R train into Bay Ridge suffer some of the worst service the system has to offer because of the infrequency of service after rush hour. I've spent significant time waiting on that same 59th St. platform waiting for a local R to take me home after 8PM. Given that, the MTA should be doing everything it can to minimize wait times and passenger frustration on that line. I don't expect extra trains, but if a connecting express train is already in the station, it should never leave while a local is just seconds away from closing its doors.
This also leads to passenger frustration and stress, which I'm sure is positively correlated with incidence of violence, accidents, mistreatment of MTA employees. This makes what probably amounts to a 30 second tradeoff seem very worth it for all involved.
I'm asking that an express or connecting train never leave a station while another train is entering the other side with passengers waiting to connect.
Thank you for your consideration.
Charles E. O'Donnell
MTA Passenger, NYC + NYS Taxpayer
Christopher Walken on Path 101
We made a set of videos to give our various perspectives on Path 101. You should definitely check them out on the Path 101 blog.
I had a little fun, though, and decided to make Christopher Walken our Path 101 spokesman:
links for 2008-01-03
-
"I am not a candidate for President," says Mayor Bloomberg, as channeled by columnist Michael Daly. "Not that I couldn't run if I wanted to. That $50 million Obama and Clinton and Huckabee and Romney and the rest spent out in Iowa? A mere bag of shells."
You don't own your social graph (Or, how not to solve 0.0003% of the world's problems.)
So this morning's tech news is that one person got kicked off of Facebook.
Yawn.
But, since Techmeme is the geek water cooler, I guess we should all be talking about it. I suppose Scoble is like Desperate Housewives or Grey's Anatomy--the shows aren't even that good, but you gotta watch because it seems everyone else is talking about it.
Today, Mr. Scoble got booted from Facebook for violating their terms of service... for running some kind of script that seems to scrape social graph data off of Facebook.
People seem to forget what "I agree to the Terms of Service" means. If you join a service, and invite all your friends to it, contribute all sorts of data, etc., don't get all pissy when you break the rules and they boot you.
Why?
Because these are the rules that everyone else agreed to as well.
If I was your friend, I wouldn't want you using some script to scrape my data and take it off Facebook. People seem to forget that friendships are two way relationships... those are people on the other end, not just data... and you don't own the data on the other people. These are people that looked at the Facebook TOS (or should have), were fine with it, and decided to set up shop. They don't want to live in a digital place where people who violate the TOS pulling their data run amuck. Not that I think Scoble is malintentioned, but unless he gets every single one of his friends to accept the porting of their data to another place, I don't see what kind of case he his. I don't remember anything in the "accept friend request" thing that says, "accept it when your friend wants to run a script that yanks data about you off of Facebook and brings it to some other place who's TOS you will never see."
Does the script take into consideration the privacy preferences of Scoble's friends, or does it assume they're all as public to everyone as they are to him, because he's logged in with his account?
When are the geeks going to realize that 99.99% of the world's population doesn't need or want data portability. Sure, it would make our lives more convenient if my I could see the restaurants my friends frequent through their credit card purchase data, but rather than try and convince Mastercard to accept open data standards, build an app with a simple hack that allows me to download it, and moreover, a reason to. That's what Mint and Wesabe are doing with financial data.
And as for the social networks, MOST people don't care about being on 3423 social networks at once with 43,000 friends, and sharing apps and data between these friends.
In fact, I can't think of a single situation where I thought to myself, "Boy, I'd really love to be able to listen to the music that my LinkedIn contacts do."
And I have no problem keeping professional contacts on LinkedIn and real friends on Facebook, and I'm unapologetic about it.
Last time I checked, real life was about different social spheres. My "real" social graph isn't a completely intermingled, open flow of data, nor do I want it to be. My digital life works best not just when it improves my real life, but also reflects it. I'm not friends with everyone. I don't want everyone's data. I don't want to show everyone else my data. There's enough of me already out there with very little effort on my part.
So, Mr. Scoble, please stay off Facebook if you plan on running scripts that the rest of us agreed weren't cool in the TOS. If you think the TOS needs to be changed, tell us about the app, tell Facebook, and gather support without breaking the rules first. While they've made mistakes in the past, Facebook seems pretty responsive to users when they gather a large amount of support.
Blogged with Flock
A little off-color Web 2.0 humor...
Q: Why did the porn site put MyBlogLog widgets on their pages?
A: So you could see all the people that came before you.
Blogged with Flock
This graph is what every startup should aim for: My month over month increase in Twitter usage
I think this is an amazing graph, because its not just about getting users, but getting each user to find more and more utility in your site month over month. Users can be obtained, but there's no substitute for this kind of single user growth in activity.
via Brad Kellett's Twitter Graphs.
Blogged with Flock